From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265086AbUGGMbv (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:31:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265089AbUGGMbu (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:31:50 -0400 Received: from apegate.roma1.infn.it ([141.108.7.31]:10369 "EHLO apona.ape") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265086AbUGGMbt (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:31:49 -0400 Message-ID: <40EBED33.3050707@roma1.infn.it> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:31:47 +0200 From: Davide Rossetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MSI to memory? References: <200407011215.59723.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <20040701115339.A4265@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20040701115339.A4265@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rajesh Shah wrote: > What type of usage model did you have in mind to have the > >device write to memory instead of using MSI for interrupts? > > for instance for a fast wake-up trick. the driver loops on a memory location until the MSI write access changes the memory content...