public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Cc: Linux-Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@polcom.net>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: post 2.6.7 BK change breaks Java?
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:20:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F20372.9000205@quark.didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8A43C34093B3D5119F7D0004AC56F4BC082C7F9D@difpst1a.dif.dk>

Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Con Kolivas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>but I suspect it's one of those possibly interfering. Looking at the
>>>>>>patches in question I have no idea how they could do it. I guess if you
>>>>>>can try backing them out it would be helpful. Here are links to the
>>>>>>patches in question.
>>>>>>http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1100_ip_tabl
>>>>>>es.patch
>>>>>>http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1105_CAN-200
>>>>>>4-0497.patch
>>>>>>http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1110_proc.pa
>>>>>>tch
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks Con, I'll try playing with those tomorrow (got no time tonight),
>>>>>and report back.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ok, got them all 3 backed out of 2.6.7-mm7 , but that doesn't change a
>>>>thing. The JVM still dies when I try to run eclipse.
>>>
>>>I can run Eclipse without any problems on 2.6.7-bk20-ck5 + few other not
>>>related patches. Maybe try using non -mm? Try 2.6.7-bk20 and then try
>>>reverting some patches. Maybe there is some other problem in -mm that
>>>gives similar results?
>>>
>>
>>with plain 2.6.7-bk20 I see the issue, same with 2.6.7-mm7. Reverting
>>http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@1.1743 from -mm7 fixes the
>>issue. I'm currently building 2.6.7-bk20 minus that cset and I'll report
>>back on the results of that in a few minutes.
>>
> 
> 2.6.7-bk20 minus the cset works.
> 
> Testing with 2.6.8-rc1 and backing out one or both of the changes in the
> cset I get these results :
> 2.6.8-rc1       - vanilla                                       - breaks Java
> 2.6.8-rc1-jju1  - both changes backed out                       - works
> 2.6.8-rc1-jju2  - only first change (sys_rt_sigsuspend) applied - works
> 2.6.8-rc1-jju3  - only second change (sys_sigaltstack) applied  - breaks Java
> 
> --
> Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>

Looks like a GCC (gcc version 3.4.1 20040702 (Red Hat Linux 3.4.1-2)) 
screwup:

sys_sigaltstack:
         movl    4(%esp), %eax
         movl    8(%esp), %edx
         movl    56(%esp), %ecx
         jmp     do_sigaltstack

The offsets should be 4 more, to account for the return address on the 
stack.

--
				Brian Gerst

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12  3:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-05 23:11 post 2.6.7 BK change breaks Java? Matthias Andree
2004-07-06 15:55 ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 16:14   ` Matthias Andree
2004-07-06 17:49     ` John Richard Moser
2004-07-06 22:45     ` Andy Isaacson
2004-07-09 13:51 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-09 14:54   ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-09 16:37     ` José de Paula
2004-07-09 17:55     ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-10 11:41       ` Go Taniguchi
2004-07-11 15:16       ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-11 15:19         ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-11 15:35           ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-11 15:35         ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-07-11 15:38           ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-12  0:56             ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-12  3:20               ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2004-07-12  3:57                 ` Brian Gerst
2004-07-12 11:01                   ` Jesper Juhl
2004-07-12 12:38                     ` Brian Gerst
2004-07-12 14:05                       ` Matthias Andree
2004-07-12 15:59                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-12 21:50                   ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-06 18:38 Ray Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F20372.9000205@quark.didntduck.org \
    --to=bgerst@didntduck.org \
    --cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
    --cc=kangur@polcom.net \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox