From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266787AbUGLKpc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:45:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266789AbUGLKpc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:45:32 -0400 Received: from tristate.vision.ee ([194.204.30.144]:56247 "HELO mail.city.ee") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266787AbUGLKp0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:45:26 -0400 Message-ID: <40F26BD5.3080401@vision.ee> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:45:41 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lenar_L=F5hmus?= Organization: Vision User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040705) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Voluntary Preemption + concurent games References: <20040709182638.GA11310@elte.hu> <20040711143853.GA6555@elte.hu> <20040711201753.GA11073@elte.hu> <200407121123.11520.aivils@unibanka.lv> <40F25F0A.3060900@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <40F25F0A.3060900@kolivas.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: > Aivils writes: > >> 2.6.XX non-preemptive and 2.6.XX voluntary-preemptive task >> scheduling looks very similar. My gamer' s eye report me very > > > I'm not sure I understand you. You said that voluntary preempt and > preempt look the same yet in your last line you say voluntary preempt > allows you to move away from 2.4.26? He said that voluntary preempt and non-preempt look similar but voluntary preempt subjectively feels better. Standard preempt was not compared as I understand. Lenar