From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266185AbUGLOPc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:15:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266818AbUGLOPc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:15:32 -0400 Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]:39040 "EHLO zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266185AbUGLOPb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:15:31 -0400 Message-ID: <40F29CF9.4000400@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:15:21 -0400 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: Chris Friesen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Con Kolivas , ck kernel mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch References: <20040711143853.GA6555@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20040711143853.GA6555@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > it was reporting more accurate latencies, except that there were strange > spikes of latencies. It turned out that for whatever reason, userspace > RDTSC is not always reliable on my box (!). Would the fact that rdtsc is not serializing have any effect here? Or would that be a small enough error to not have any effect? Chris