public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:34:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F2BD93.3090505@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r7rhb4jw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>

Florian Weimer wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin:
> 
> 
>>Followup to:  <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407102126150.10242@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
>>By author:    Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>>
>>>  - `return f();' in a function returning void (where f() returns void as well)
>>>
>>
>>Considering this one a bug is daft in the extreme.
>>
>>Why?  Because "return f();" is the only kind of tailcall syntax C has,
> 
> 
> Huh?  If you remove the "return", it's still a valid tailcall syntax
> (at least from GCC's perspective).

Yes, but as I said in the portion of the message you deleted, it means you 
have to use a different syntax with void functions as for all other functions.

That is daft in the extreme.

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-07 19:25 [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/ Chris Wright
2004-07-08  3:12 ` Herbert Xu
2004-07-08  3:27   ` David S. Miller
2004-07-08  3:43     ` Miles Bader
2004-07-08  5:22       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-08  5:35         ` Miles Bader
2004-07-08 15:58           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-08 16:23             ` Dave Jones
2004-07-08 17:57               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-09 11:23             ` Roman Zippel
2004-07-10 19:41               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-11 10:29                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-11 10:54                   ` viro
2004-07-11 16:14                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-11 20:05                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-07-12 15:58                   ` Florian Weimer
2004-07-12 16:34                     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2004-07-08 11:18         ` Herbert Xu
2004-07-08 13:10           ` Andreas Schwab
2004-07-08 13:56             ` Herbert Xu
2004-07-08 14:13               ` Andreas Schwab
2004-07-08  5:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-08 16:09     ` Timothy Miller
2004-07-08 16:21       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-08 16:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-08 16:52         ` Timothy Miller
     [not found]           ` <200407090056.51084.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-07-12 15:17             ` Timothy Miller
2004-07-12 16:12               ` Andreas Schwab
2004-07-12 16:51                 ` Andrew Pimlott
2004-07-15 16:15                 ` Timothy Miller
2004-07-09 20:36     ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-09 23:49       ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-10  1:43         ` Kyle Moffett
2004-07-10  1:47           ` Herbert Xu
2004-07-10 21:53             ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-10  6:18       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-10  6:23         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-10  6:58           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-10  9:48             ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-10 15:39           ` Roland Dreier
2004-07-11  2:45             ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2004-07-11 21:19             ` Olaf Titz
2004-07-10  9:39         ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-10  9:56           ` Herbert Xu
2004-07-11 21:47           ` Olaf Titz
2004-07-13  8:43             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-14  3:12               ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-13 18:53             ` Elladan
2004-07-14  3:15             ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-10 12:11         ` Roman Zippel
2004-07-10 21:59         ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-11  4:40           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-07-10  9:31       ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2004-07-10 22:07         ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-07-10 23:52         ` Paul Jackson
2004-07-11  0:12           ` Tim Wright
2004-07-12 22:03       ` Bill Davidsen
2004-07-10  8:18     ` Florian Weimer
2004-07-08 11:10   ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-07-08 11:28     ` Michael Buesch
2004-07-08 11:44       ` Martin Zwickel
2004-07-08 12:06         ` Michael Buesch
2004-07-08 12:38           ` [OT] NULL versus 0 (Re: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/) Kari Hurtta
2004-07-08 12:42             ` Michael Buesch
2004-07-08 12:57               ` Kari Hurtta
2004-07-08 15:25                 ` Herbert Xu
2004-07-10  8:22           ` [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/ Florian Weimer
2004-07-08 11:43     ` P. Benie
2004-07-08 14:32       ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-07-08 15:00         ` Michael Poole
2004-07-08 15:30           ` P. Benie
2004-07-08 15:55           ` Andreas Schwab
2004-07-10  7:09         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-10  7:02       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-07-10  6:59     ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F2BD93.3090505@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox