public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
	"Matthew C. Dobson [imap]" <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched domains bringup race?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:31:33 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FB78D5.1070604@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040718134559.A25488@unix-os.sc.intel.com>

Keshavamurthy Anil S wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:13:46PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
>>I keep getting oopses for the non-boot CPU in find_busiest_group(). 
>>This occurs the first time that the CPU goes idle.  Those groups are set
>>up in sched_init_smp(), which is called after smp_init():
>>
>>static int init(void * unused)
>>{
>>	...
>>        fixup_cpu_present_map();
>>        smp_init();
>>        sched_init_smp();
>>
>>But, the idle threads for the secondary CPUs are initialized in
>>smp_init().  So, what happens when a CPU tries to schedule (using sched
>>domains) before sched_init_smp() completes?  I think it goes boom! :)
>>
>>Anyway, I was thinking that we should just hold the runqueue lock on the
>>non-boot CPUs until the sched domain init code is done.  Does that sound
>>feasible?
> 
> 
> Even on my system which is Intel 865 chipset (P4 with HT enabled system) 
> I see a bug check somewhere in the schedular_tick during boot.
> However if I move the sched_init_smp() after do_basic_setup() the
> kernel boots without any problem. Any clue here?
> 
>  static int init(void * unused)
>  {
>  	...
>          fixup_cpu_present_map();
>          smp_init();
> 	 populate_rootfs();
> 	 do_basic_setup();
>  
>          sched_init_smp();

There shouldn't be any problem doing that if we have to, obviously we
need to know why. Is it possible that cpu_sibling_map, or one of the
CPU masks isn't set up correctly at the time of the call?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-19  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-16  2:13 sched domains bringup race? Dave Hansen
2004-07-16  3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-16  3:30   ` Dave Hansen
2004-07-16  3:46     ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-16  5:27       ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-18 20:45 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2004-07-19  7:31   ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-07-22 21:55     ` Nathan Lynch
2004-07-22 23:23       ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2004-07-23  0:33       ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40FB78D5.1070604@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox