From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
"Matthew C. Dobson [imap]" <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched domains bringup race?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:31:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FB78D5.1070604@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040718134559.A25488@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Keshavamurthy Anil S wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:13:46PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
>>I keep getting oopses for the non-boot CPU in find_busiest_group().
>>This occurs the first time that the CPU goes idle. Those groups are set
>>up in sched_init_smp(), which is called after smp_init():
>>
>>static int init(void * unused)
>>{
>> ...
>> fixup_cpu_present_map();
>> smp_init();
>> sched_init_smp();
>>
>>But, the idle threads for the secondary CPUs are initialized in
>>smp_init(). So, what happens when a CPU tries to schedule (using sched
>>domains) before sched_init_smp() completes? I think it goes boom! :)
>>
>>Anyway, I was thinking that we should just hold the runqueue lock on the
>>non-boot CPUs until the sched domain init code is done. Does that sound
>>feasible?
>
>
> Even on my system which is Intel 865 chipset (P4 with HT enabled system)
> I see a bug check somewhere in the schedular_tick during boot.
> However if I move the sched_init_smp() after do_basic_setup() the
> kernel boots without any problem. Any clue here?
>
> static int init(void * unused)
> {
> ...
> fixup_cpu_present_map();
> smp_init();
> populate_rootfs();
> do_basic_setup();
>
> sched_init_smp();
There shouldn't be any problem doing that if we have to, obviously we
need to know why. Is it possible that cpu_sibling_map, or one of the
CPU masks isn't set up correctly at the time of the call?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-19 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-16 2:13 sched domains bringup race? Dave Hansen
2004-07-16 3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-16 3:30 ` Dave Hansen
2004-07-16 3:46 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-16 5:27 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-18 20:45 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2004-07-19 7:31 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-07-22 21:55 ` Nathan Lynch
2004-07-22 23:23 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2004-07-23 0:33 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40FB78D5.1070604@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox