From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266784AbUGVAW4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:22:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266786AbUGVAWz (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:22:55 -0400 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([64.81.245.74]:1422 "EHLO ishtar.tlinx.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266784AbUGVAWm (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:22:42 -0400 Message-ID: <40FF0885.7060704@tlinx.org> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:21:25 -0700 From: L A Walsh User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wedgwood CC: Linux-Kernel , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.6.7-vanilla-SMP kernel: pagebuf_get: failed to lookup pages References: <40FF0479.6050509@tlinx.org> <20040722001224.GC30595@taniwha.stupidest.org> In-Reply-To: <20040722001224.GC30595@taniwha.stupidest.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Will this be included/fixed in 2.6.8? How serious is the problem? The system doesn't seem to panic or indicate backup failures. Setting up a CVS tree to get a patch for a "stable-series" kernel seems a bit unstable. I'm not sure what I'd pull in besides the fix or even if I'd pull down a coherent/stable CVS image if I downloaded in the middle of when some other patch was being checked in. Maybe I'm sounding like a wimp, but the idea of pulling in freshly checked in CVS code for use on a 'stable' machine is bordering on my discomfort zone. :-) -l Chris Wedgwood wrote: >On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:04:09PM -0700, L A Walsh wrote: > > > >>Any idea what this message means? >> >> > >it means "try the CVS tree" (i think hch fixed this and it's in CVS >but not mainline) > > > --cw > >