Re: New dev model (was [PATCH] delete devfs)

Greg KH
2004-07-22T19:17:32Z

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>
> The worse is the lack of stable name of devices, in udev too.
> I.e. microcode loader (Intel CPU) needs a device, which was so
> named (last time I controlled):

When was the last time you _used_ the microcode device?

Yeah, there are still a small number of drivers that are not in sysfs,
so udev doesn't know about them, but right now I'm guessing we cover
about 95%. I'm waiting for someone else to fix up the rest, if they
really have one of those odd devices :)

thanks,

greg k-h