public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>,
	marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
	khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/tdx: Add Quote generation support
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:06:26 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40caabe4c708b35844c246ec6a01b4ee03cbfa63.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <145b19b7-00e1-3542-a99d-866539081add@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 13:08 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> 
> On 5/16/22 7:58 PM, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 12:29 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* Wait for attestation completion */
> > > > > +	ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&entry->compl);
> > > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > +		/*
> > > > > +		 * For premature termination, since VMM still owns the
> > > > > +		 * shared buffer, mark the request invalid to let
> > > > > +		 * quote_callback_handler() handle the memory cleanup
> > > > > +		 * function.
> > > > > +		 */
> > > > > +		invalidate_quote_request(entry);
> > > > 
> > > > Interrupt can arrive after signal interrupt.  So invalidate_quote_request()
> > > > should check if the request is already processed, and return 0 or -EINTR.
> > > > Probably check the state always and del_list under single lock/unlock pair.
> > > 
> > > Agree. But I think we should return -EINTR for the interrupted case
> > > irrespective of the processed status (so no return 0).
> > > 
> > > I will hold the lock and handle the cleanup for the processed
> > > status.
> > 
> > Even if we check the buffer status in invalidate_quote_request(), there's no
> > guarantee the VMM won't change the buffer status _after_ we do the check, so
> > looks such check isn't necessary.
> > 
> 
> Consider the case where we get a callback interrupt, and before we
> complete the processing for it, user terminates the request. In this
> scenario,  quote_callback_handler() will consider the request is
> still valid and no do the memory cleanup. To handle this case,
> we need to check the status in invalidate_quote_request() and do
> the cleanup if required.
> 
> /* Handles early termination of GetQuote requests */
> void invalidate_quote_request(struct quote_entry *entry)
> {
>          struct tdx_quote_hdr *quote_hdr;
> 
>          /*
>           * For early termination, if the request is not yet
>           * processed by VMM (GET_QUOTE_IN_FLIGHT), the VMM
>           * still owns the shared buffer, so mark the request
>           * invalid to let quote_callback_handler() handle the
>           * memory cleanup function. If the request is already
>           * processed, then do the cleanup and return.
>           */
> 
>          mutex_lock(&quote_lock);
>          quote_hdr = (struct tdx_quote_hdr *)entry->buf->vmaddr;
>          if (quote_hdr->status == GET_QUOTE_IN_FLIGHT) {

What prevents VMM from updating quote_hdr->status from IN_FLIGHT to DONE _after_
this check?

If you want to add such check, you should check against GET_QUOTE_DONE, but not
IN_FLIGHT.  Only after status is DONE,  VMM will not update the buffer.  Perhaps
something like below:

	mutex_lock(&quote_lock);
	/* Skip invalidate the buffer if VMM has done with the buffer */
	if (quote_hdr->status == GET_QUOTE_DONE) {
		mutex_unlock(&quote_lock);
		return 0;
	}

And in the IOCTL, you can perhaps to choose to return 0, instead of -EINTR in
this case, as the Quote has been finished already.

But I am not sure whether this is necessary.  The worst case is one finished
Quote is wasted I guess.

>                  entry->valid = false;
>                  mutex_unlock(&quote_lock);
>                  return;
>          }
>          _del_quote_entry(entry);
>          mutex_unlock(&quote_lock);
> }
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks,
-Kai



  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-12 22:19 [PATCH v6 0/5] Add TDX Guest Attestation support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-12 22:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface driver Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-16 18:08   ` Wander Lairson Costa
2022-05-16 21:06     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-17  2:54   ` Kai Huang
2022-05-17 14:54     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-23  2:52       ` Kai Huang
2022-05-23  3:41         ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-12 22:19 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest event notify interrupt support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-12 22:19 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/mm: Make tdx_enc_status_changed() vmalloc address compatible Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-12 22:19 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/mm: Add noalias variants of set_memory_*crypted() functions Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-12 22:19 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/tdx: Add Quote generation support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-13 18:58   ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-05-13 19:29     ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-17  2:58       ` Kai Huang
2022-05-17 20:08         ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-17 23:06           ` Kai Huang [this message]
2022-05-17 23:32             ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40caabe4c708b35844c246ec6a01b4ee03cbfa63.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=khalid.elmously@canonical.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.cerri@canonical.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=philip.cox@canonical.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=wander@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox