From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261451AbUGWE3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:29:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267537AbUGWE3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:29:13 -0400 Received: from smtp015.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.173.59]:56433 "HELO smtp015.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261451AbUGWE3J (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:29:09 -0400 Message-ID: <41009411.1080401@yahoo.com.au> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:29:05 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040707 Debian/1.7-5 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitri Sivanich CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch for isolated scheduler domains References: <20040722164126.GB13189@sgi.com> <20040722175459.GA30059@elte.hu> <4100859C.9060409@yahoo.com.au> <20040723041349.GB15188@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040723041349.GB15188@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dimitri Sivanich wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 01:27:24PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>Cool. Have you actually tried running it? With Ingo's correction, it >>should work fine but I don't think anyone has tested this. >> > > Yup, I've been running it on an Altix. > Great. > I've created a version for sched.c (all platform) which I'll be posting > soon. That will include code for both CONFIG_NUMA_SCHED and non > CONFIG_NUMA_SCHED configurations. Sorry to throw a spanner in the works, but could you have a look at the "[PATCH] consolidate sched domains" I just sent in, and see if you can work on top of that. I really should have done that patch earlier :\