public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: "R. J. Wysocki" <rjwysocki@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Autotune swappiness01
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:29:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4104DD27.6050907@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407261234.29565.rjwysocki@sisk.pl>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1833 bytes --]

R. J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 26 of July 2004 11:31, Con Kolivas wrote:
> 
>>R. J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday 26 of July 2004 03:09, Con Kolivas wrote:
>>>
>>>>Con Kolivas writes:
>>>>
>>>>>Andrew Morton writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Seriously, we've seen placebo effects before...
>>>>>
>>>>>I am in full agreement there... It's easy to see that applications do
>>>>>not swap out overnight; but i'm having difficulty trying to find a way
>>>>>to demonstrate the other part. I guess timing the "linking the kernel
>>>>>with full debug" on a low memory box is measurable.
>>>>
>>>>I should have said - finding a swappiness that ensures not swapping out
>>>>applications with updatedb, then using that same swappiness value to do
>>>>the linking test.
>>>
>>>Please excuse me, but is that viable at all?  IMHO, it's just like trying
>>>to tune a radio including volume with only one knob.  I don't say it
>>>won't work, but the probability that it will is rather small, it seems
>>>...
>>
>>Well that's what we want. I cant remember other desktop operating
>>systems setting a root only control between night and day, or between
>>copying ISOs and running applications or...
> 
> 
> I agree, but isn't it related to the fact that other desktop OSes usually 
> don't run anything like updatedb nightly?
> 
> Perhaps we need a bit more sophisticated swap algorithm than other OSes do.  
> For example, couldn't we add an additional parameter to control the swapping 
> "behavior", apart from the swappiness?  Something like adding the second knob 
> in my radio example?  Just thinking,

I think one knob is one knob too many already. However as Andrew has 
pointed out there are server workloads that want swappiness of 100, 
hence I leave the knob in place.

Proof is in the pudding. Try my patch and/or post an alternative.

Cheers,
Con

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-26 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-26  0:25 [PATCH][2.6.8-rc1-mm1] Autotune swappiness01 Con Kolivas
2004-07-26  0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26  0:43   ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26  0:48     ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26  1:01       ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26  1:09         ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26  8:52           ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26  9:31             ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:34               ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 10:29                 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2004-07-26 10:54                   ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 11:03                     ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:13                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 11:17                         ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:47                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 13:53                             ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 18:45                               ` Adam Kropelin
2004-07-26 18:53                                 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 17:55                     ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-07-26 20:29     ` Joel Becker
2004-07-26 20:42       ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 22:58         ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27  0:52           ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27  1:09             ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27  1:17               ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27  2:03                 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27  2:43                   ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27  3:02                     ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27  3:43                       ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27  3:47                       ` Joel Becker
2004-07-27 15:32                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-27  3:41                   ` Clemens Schwaighofer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 14:52 Martin Knoblauch
2004-07-26 21:29 DaMouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4104DD27.6050907@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjwysocki@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox