From: Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp>
To: Tim Connors <tconnors+linuxkernel1090893567@astro.swin.edu.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
kernel@kolivas.org, Joel.Becker@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Autotune swappiness01
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:41:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4105CEDF.4040009@tequila.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrn-0.9.7.4-15175-21673-200407271159-tc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tim Connors wrote:
| Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp> said on Tue, 27 Jul 2004
10:17:16 +0900:
| Depends on what you do. Do you compile kernels regularly? In
| particular, do you have to wait for them, or do you just let them sit
| in the background, and come back to them when you rememeber, since
| you've been busy doing real work for the past 5 hours? If you wait,
| then I guess you want high swapiness.
well this is a work box. I do coding, yes, but this is perl, php, etc,
mostly (99%) on remote machines. The big apps running here is mozilla,
openoffice, korganzier (yes I do the KDE bloat) and _a_ _lot_ of konsole
~ (kde terminals).
I want responsivness. I don't want to wait 10s to switch between virtual
desktops. I compile a kernel once in a while. Very rare actually,
because this is a work box and I don't reboot all the time (can't &
don't want). The last kernel change was 64d ago.
| For the rest of us who don't have to regularly read in hundreds of
| megs of disk, and don't need to use that hundreds of megs of disk over
| and over and over again (As far as I can see, this is just about
| everyone who's not a kernel developer or some big app developer[1]), I
| guess we get by just fine having smaller swapiness.
well the only thing that needs disk over and over again is this _crappy_
gentoo because it needs to compile everything. I really hate myself for
using it, because _this_ probably screws up _all_ the page cache, etc.
| [1] Maybe kde is bloated enough that you if want to start the equiv of
| an xterm all the time, maybe caching helps a lot there, but I make a
| point of using lean apps[2].
well, to be honest, I doubt it is so bloated anymore. I think gnome is
the better bloat of those two.
| [2] Sad when you consider xemacs lean, isn't it? ;)
well, if you call xemacs (the editor without an OS) lean ... *hmm* but I
am a vim man after all ;)
- --
Clemens Schwaighofer - IT Engineer & System Administration
==========================================================
TEQUILA\Japan, 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8167, JAPAN
Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343
http://www.tequila.co.jp
==========================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBBc7ejBz/yQjBxz8RAqYwAJoDCBWOxMRXAHHVelV+M9ObQjpsYQCg6a8n
GIRF1+LjDZ+U4TCovnk+RcA=
=K1Xc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-27 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-26 0:25 [PATCH][2.6.8-rc1-mm1] Autotune swappiness01 Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 0:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 0:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 1:01 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 1:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 8:52 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 9:31 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:34 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 10:29 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 10:54 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 11:03 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:13 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 11:17 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-26 11:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-26 13:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 18:45 ` Adam Kropelin
2004-07-26 18:53 ` R. J. Wysocki
2004-07-26 17:55 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2004-07-26 20:29 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-26 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-26 22:58 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27 0:52 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 1:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 1:17 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 2:03 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 2:43 ` Con Kolivas
2004-07-27 3:02 ` Tim Connors
2004-07-27 3:43 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-07-27 3:47 ` Joel Becker
2004-07-27 15:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-07-27 3:41 ` Clemens Schwaighofer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-26 14:52 Martin Knoblauch
2004-07-26 21:29 DaMouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4105CEDF.4040009@tequila.co.jp \
--to=cs@tequila.co.jp \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tconnors+linuxkernel1090893567@astro.swin.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox