From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267475AbUG2R3T (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:29:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264791AbUG2R07 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:26:59 -0400 Received: from services.exanet.com ([212.143.73.102]:30514 "EHLO services.exanet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264501AbUG2RYU (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:24:20 -0400 Message-ID: <410932C2.6080102@exanet.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:24:18 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031027 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Lee Irwin III CC: jmoyer@redhat.com, suparna@in.ibm.com, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-osdl@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] AIO poll References: <20040702130030.GA4256@in.ibm.com> <20040702163946.GJ3450@in.ibm.com> <16649.5485.651481.534569@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <41091FAA.6080409@exanet.com> <20040729171037.GS2334@holomorphy.com> In-Reply-To: <20040729171037.GS2334@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2004 17:24:19.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1800360:01C47590] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: >On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:02:50PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > >>I second the motion. I don't see how one can write a server which uses >>both networking and block aio without aio poll. >> >> > >I just did it for OLS. The answer is busywait. i.e. 100% cpu. This is >because you can't use timeouts unless they're unified. > > > > That's not a server. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.