public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Weeks <greg.weeks@timesys.com>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Cc: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LinuxPPC-dev Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] PPC math-emu multiply problem
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:45:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <410A5F08.90103@timesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A46787F8-E194-11D8-B8DB-003065F9B7DC@embeddededge.com>

Dan Malek wrote:

>
> On Jul 29, 2004, at 10:06 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 29, 2004, at 8:14 AM, Greg Weeks wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seeing what appears to be a bug in the ppc kernel trap math
>>> emulator. An extreme case for multiplies isn't working the way gcc
>>> soft-float or hardware floating point is.
>>
>
> I'm not surprised.  I lifted this code from Sparc, glibc, and adapted
> it as best I could for PPC years ago for the 8xx.  I was happy when
> it appeared to work for the general cases. :-)
>
> Due to its overhead, I never expected it to be _the_ solution for
> processors that don't have floating point hardware.  Recompiling
> the libraries with soft-float and using that option when compiling
> is the way to go.

OK, this patch fixes my multiply problem with the LSB test. I still need 
to test to make sure I didn't break anything else, but it appears the 
rounding is only used when converting back to IEEE format. Is there some 
reason this is something really dumb to do?

Signed-off-by: Greg Weeks <greg.weeks@timesys.com> under TS0087

--- tanith-linux-2.6.6/arch/ppc/math-emu/soft-fp.h.orig    2004-07-30 
10:31:34.000000000 -0400
+++ tanith-linux-2.6.6/arch/ppc/math-emu/soft-fp.h    2004-07-30 
10:31:57.000000000 -0400
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 # define FP_RND_PINF        2
 # define FP_RND_MINF        3
 #ifndef FP_ROUNDMODE
-# define FP_ROUNDMODE        FP_RND_NEAREST
+# define FP_ROUNDMODE        FP_RND_ZERO
 #endif
 #endif


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-30 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-29 13:14 [BUG] PPC math-emu multiply problem Greg Weeks
2004-07-29 14:06 ` Kumar Gala
2004-07-29 14:26   ` Greg Weeks
2004-07-29 19:22   ` Dan Malek
2004-07-29 19:47     ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-07-30 14:45     ` Greg Weeks [this message]
2004-07-30 15:23       ` Greg Weeks
2004-08-09 16:56         ` Tom Rini
2004-08-09 17:42           ` Dan Malek
2004-08-09 22:18             ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-08-09 22:23             ` Tom Rini
2004-08-16 13:02               ` Greg Weeks
2004-08-16 14:48                 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-16 18:28                   ` Greg Weeks
2004-08-16 18:35                     ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=410A5F08.90103@timesys.com \
    --to=greg.weeks@timesys.com \
    --cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox