From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263850AbUHEMed (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:34:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262328AbUHEMec (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:34:32 -0400 Received: from mato.luukku.com ([193.209.83.251]:35292 "EHLO mato.luukku.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267681AbUHEMc0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:32:26 -0400 Message-ID: <411228FF.485E4D07@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:33:03 +0300 From: Jari Ruusu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.22aa1r7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Fruhwirth Clemens , James Morris , Kernel Mailing List , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.8-rc3 - BSD licensing References: <1091644663.21675.51.camel@ghanima> <1091647612.24215.12.camel@ghanima> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > Now, I obviously believe that Jari has acted like an ass, since he has > used the very same code under the GPL before, but hey, that's his problem. Linus, are you saying that anyone who refuses to re-license their work under license of your choice, is an ass? Or just the ones who catch you re-licencing their work without permission? > Jari - please stop distributing your loop-aes patches. If you consider the > license to be non-GPL-compatible, then you have no business distributing > the thing as kernel patches. Alternatively, just say it's GPL'd. You can't > have it both ways. I say that loop-AES is GPL-compatible. Most of the files in loop-AES are licensed under GPL. Some files have less restrictive license, but are still licensed under GPL-compatible license. I am not aware of any files in loop-AES that are GPL-incompatible. -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD