From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS readahead bug in 2.6.8-rc[1-3]
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:55:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4112D6FD.4030707@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41127371.1000603@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Phillip Lougher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a readahead bug in do_generic_mapping_read (filemap.c). This
> bug appears to have been introduced in 2.6.8-rc1. Specifically the bug
> is caused by an incorrect code change which causes VFS to call
> readpage() for indexes beyond the end of files where the file length is
> zero or a 4k multiple.
>
> In Squashfs this causes a variety of almost immediate OOPes because
> Squashfs trusts the VFS not to pass invalid index values. For other
> filesystems it may also be causing subtle bugs. I have received
> prune_dcache oopes similar to Gene Heskett's (which was also
> pointer corruption), and so it may fix this and other reported
> readahead bugs.
>
> The patch is against 2.6.8-rc3.
>
Good work - bug is mine, sorry.
You actually re-introduce a bug where read can return incorrect
data due to i_size changing from under it (I introduced this bug
while fixing that one).
My fix was to re-check i_size and update 'nr' after doing the
->readpage. You could probably fix up both problems with your
patch and also copying the hunk down to after i_size gets rechecked.
Does that sound ok?
The root of the problem is that i_size gets checked from multiple
places that it can get out of synch. A nice fix would be to snapshot
i_size once, and pass that around everywhere. Unfortunately this is
very intrusive.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-06 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 17:50 [PATCH] VFS readahead bug in 2.6.8-rc[1-3] Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 0:55 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-08-06 2:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-06 16:58 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 18:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-06 19:14 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 19:31 ` viro
2004-08-06 19:18 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 19:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-16 7:55 ` [PATCH] " Ram Pai
2004-08-07 14:21 ` Pozsar Balazs
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408052104420.2241-100000@dyn319181.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <411322E8.4000503@yahoo.com.au>
2004-08-06 10:47 ` Ram
2004-08-06 17:05 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 18:02 ` Ram Pai
2004-08-06 19:09 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-06 19:39 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 20:21 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4112D6FD.4030707@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox