From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS readahead bug in 2.6.8-rc[1-3]
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:19:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4112EAAB.8040005@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4112D6FD.4030707@yahoo.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Phillip Lougher wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is a readahead bug in do_generic_mapping_read (filemap.c). This
>> bug appears to have been introduced in 2.6.8-rc1. Specifically the bug
>> is caused by an incorrect code change which causes VFS to call
>> readpage() for indexes beyond the end of files where the file length is
>> zero or a 4k multiple.
>>
>> In Squashfs this causes a variety of almost immediate OOPes because
>> Squashfs trusts the VFS not to pass invalid index values. For other
>> filesystems it may also be causing subtle bugs. I have received
>> prune_dcache oopes similar to Gene Heskett's (which was also
>> pointer corruption), and so it may fix this and other reported
>> readahead bugs.
>>
>> The patch is against 2.6.8-rc3.
>>
>
> Good work - bug is mine, sorry.
>
On second thought, maybe not. I think your filesystem is at fault.
Firstly, there possibly is a bug in do_pagecache_readahead which allows
it to
read off the end of the file in a completely serialised situation. But
even so,
notice the absence of locking - i_size can change at any time can't it? Then
your fix will blow up when you race with a truncate, right?
I think you need to handle reading off the end of the file properly: I'm not
too familiar with this code, but IIRC you are allowed to setup pagecache
past
the end of the file - it gets handled correctly in
do_generic_mapping_read, and
ends up falling off the LRU. This should help you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-06 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 17:50 [PATCH] VFS readahead bug in 2.6.8-rc[1-3] Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 0:55 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-06 2:19 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-08-06 16:58 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 18:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-06 19:14 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 19:31 ` viro
2004-08-06 19:18 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 19:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-16 7:55 ` [PATCH] " Ram Pai
2004-08-07 14:21 ` Pozsar Balazs
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408052104420.2241-100000@dyn319181.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <411322E8.4000503@yahoo.com.au>
2004-08-06 10:47 ` Ram
2004-08-06 17:05 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 18:02 ` Ram Pai
2004-08-06 19:09 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-06 19:39 ` Phillip Lougher
2004-08-06 20:21 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4112EAAB.8040005@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox