Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

Matthew Dobson
2004-10-05T22:26:29Z

On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 02:17, Paul Jackson wrote:
> The /dev/cpuset pseudo file system api was chosen because it was
> convenient for small scale work, learning and experimentation, because
> it was a natural for the hierarchical name space with permissions that I
> required, and because it was convenient to leverage existing vfs
> structure in the kernel.

I really like the /dev/cpuset FS. I would like to leverage most of that
code to be the user level interface to creating, linking & destroying
sched_domains at some point. This, of course, is assuming that the
dynamic sched_domains concept meets with something less than catcalls
and jeers... ;)

-Matt