From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266720AbUHIQmD (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:42:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266715AbUHIQmD (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:42:03 -0400 Received: from snota.svorka.net ([194.19.72.11]:56238 "HELO snota.svorka.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266720AbUHIQlv (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:41:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4117A955.9010708@svorka.net> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:41:57 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Espen_Fjellv=E6r_Olsen?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040805) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: nForce 3 support X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have heard a lot of people complaining about stability problems with nForce2, i wonder if nForce 3 have these problems, or any other for that sake. - -- Med Vennlig Hilsen / Best Regards Espen Fjellvær Olsen eldiablo@svorka.net Norway -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBF6lUibTL5aHQf7URAqDsAKCeJf/CyahanVDpCeU/juR30kfVSQCeI+hh Vf4j/fFLfLKTmcLRjqamuOg= =yxcn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----