Re: [RFC] Bug zapper? :)

[John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>]

Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, John Richard Moser wrote:
> 
> 
>>What I'm suggesting isn't much though, is it really? 
> 
> 
> Then why haven't you done it already ? ;)
> 

Alright, it's a big undertaking ;)

> On a more serious note, some other people are already
> auditing the code on a regular basis, while you weren't
> paying attention ...
> 

I'm suggesting things to make code auditing simpler, more accurate, more 
precise.  "Quality-Assurance audited code still contains on average 5 
bugs per kloc" is a really nasty thought.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/9/369 was the major explaination.  It's big 
and clunky to have before each function; but at least it's not ugly, and 
it's potentially helpful.  Maybe a few of the like in the smallest 
driver possible to see how it feels?  (/dev/mem?)

-- 
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.