From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>, Josh Aas <josha@sgi.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
steiner@sgi.com
Subject: Re: bkl cleanup in do_sysctl
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:46:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <411925FA.2000303@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1092163919.782.54.camel@mindpipe>
Lee Revell wrote:
>On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 13:28, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
>
>
>>Remember that the BKL isn't a plain-old spinlock. You're allowed to
>>sleep while holding it and it can be recursively held, which isn't true
>>for other spinlocks.
>>
>>So, if you want to replace it with a spinlock, you'll need to do audits
>>looking for sysctl users that might_sleep() or get called recursively
>>somehow. The might_sleep() debugging checks should help immensely for
>>the first part, but all you'll get are deadlocks at runtime for any
>>recursive holders. But, those cases are increasingly rare, so you might
>>luck out and not have any.
>>
>>Or, you could just make it a semaphore and forget about the no sleeping
>>requirement.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Someone once suggested that newbies who show up on LKML wanting to learn
>kernel hacking should be assigned to find one use of the BKL and replace
>it with proper locking. Something similar worked very well with my
>previous employer, before giving someone root, new hires would first be
>assigned some task like writing a script to take the user account
>database and generate a report of old accounts on a bunch of machines,
>or rewrite the RADIUS accounting scripts, where the point was really to
>get them familiar with the system.
>
>This way, even if they come back with a totally botched fix, someone
>will probably just post a correct one. We could get rid of the BKL very
>soon, I count only 247 files with lock_kernel in them.
>
>For example reiserfs uses the BKL for all write locking (!), but it
>probably would not be too hard to fix, because you can just look at
>another filesystem that has proper locking.
>
>
Wrong. ;-) Balancing makes it way hard. Use reiser4. That has very
sophisticated locking that pushes the research envelope, if you want to
read code to learn about locking.....
>Maybe this should be added to the FAQ:
>
>Q: I want to hack the kernel, and I *think* I know what I am doing.
>Where do I start?
>
>Lee
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-10 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 16:58 bkl cleanup in do_sysctl Josh Aas
2004-08-10 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-10 18:51 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-10 19:16 ` Roland Dreier
2004-08-10 19:21 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-10 19:46 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-08-10 20:10 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=411925FA.2000303@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josha@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox