From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268586AbUHLPRO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:17:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268587AbUHLPRO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:17:14 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:26802 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268586AbUHLPRN (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:17:13 -0400 Message-ID: <411B89EA.3040400@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:16:58 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Clem Taylor , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Any news on a higher performance sata_sil SIL_QUIRK_MOD15WRITE workaround? References: <411AFD2C.5060701@comcast.net> <411B118B.4040802@pobox.com> <1092312030.21994.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1092312030.21994.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > On Iau, 2004-08-12 at 07:43, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>Older Seagates cannot cope with this unique, but spec-correct behavior. >> >>This issue cannot even be worked around with "nblocks % 15 == 1", as was >>previously thought. Using that formula just makes the problem harder to >>reproduce. > > > It fixes it completely on the drivers/ide driver. SATA bus traces say otherwise. Jeff