From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268915AbUHMA5g (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:57:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268917AbUHMA5f (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:57:35 -0400 Received: from smtp106.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.169.226]:30392 "HELO smtp106.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S268915AbUHMA5d (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:57:33 -0400 Message-ID: <411C11FB.305@yahoo.com.au> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:57:31 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040726 Debian/1.7.1-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Omar Kilani CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Performance Degradation: 2.6.8-rc4-bk1 vs RHEL 2.4.21-15.0.3 References: <295911442.20040812150922@dns.toxicfilms.tv> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Omar Kilani wrote: >Anything else I should be monitoring? > > Take a profile of each kernel. Boot with profile=1, then run: echo 0 > /proc/profile ; ab --foo --bar ; readprofile | sort -nr | head -n30 > profile.out And send in the profiles for both kernels.