From: Greg Weeks <greg.weeks@timesys.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>,
Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@freescale.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LinuxPPC-dev Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] PPC math-emu multiply problem
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:28:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4120FCD0.2090305@timesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040816144829.GC2377@smtp.west.cox.net>
Tom Rini wrote:
>>The way I got the LSB tests to pass was to remove the round in the
>>denormalised underflow case. This appears to match the hardware
>>behavior. I've not looked at the PPC floating point model close enough
>>to know if this is proper behavior. It is what the LSB tests are
>>expecting and doesn't cause a failure in any of the other LSB tests.
>>
>>
>
>Have you guys run the LSB tests on some PPC with hw floating point (is
>that what you mean by 'matches the hardware behavior' ?) to see if the
>test also passes there as-is? And does anyone object to this patch?
>Now that 2.6.8.1 is out I'm gonna start committing in a bunch of stuff
>I've had queued up and see if I can get Linus to pull. Thanks.
>
>
>
I didn't run the entire LSB, just some of the math tests. I had an 8260
and the 8560 we found the problem on and also a normal x86 box. I think
this is the correct fix. At least all of the LSB math tests pass now and
the LTP float tests don't complain.
Greg Weeks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-16 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-29 13:14 [BUG] PPC math-emu multiply problem Greg Weeks
2004-07-29 14:06 ` Kumar Gala
2004-07-29 14:26 ` Greg Weeks
2004-07-29 19:22 ` Dan Malek
2004-07-29 19:47 ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-07-30 14:45 ` Greg Weeks
2004-07-30 15:23 ` Greg Weeks
2004-08-09 16:56 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-09 17:42 ` Dan Malek
2004-08-09 22:18 ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-08-09 22:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-16 13:02 ` Greg Weeks
2004-08-16 14:48 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-16 18:28 ` Greg Weeks [this message]
2004-08-16 18:35 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4120FCD0.2090305@timesys.com \
--to=greg.weeks@timesys.com \
--cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=kumar.gala@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox