From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268251AbUHQOg6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:36:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268248AbUHQOg6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:36:58 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.SGI.COM ([192.48.171.19]:19152 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268267AbUHQOgh (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:36:37 -0400 Message-ID: <41221890.8070307@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:39:12 -0500 From: Ray Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: cpufreq deprecation References: <20040817105859.GA1497@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040817105859.GA1497@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel, A scan of the lkml archives on theaimsgroup for cpufreq shows only this message about deprecation. Where was this discussed? Is there an alternative for this information being proposed? Thanks, Ray Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Today I learned that /proc/cpufreq is going to be removed from > 2.6.. I thought that 2.6 means "no interface changes" :-(. Anyway, if > we are going to warn about it, we might want to include newline... > > Please apply, > Pavel -- Best Regards, Ray ----------------------------------------------- Ray Bryant 512-453-9679 (work) 512-507-7807 (cell) raybry@sgi.com raybry@austin.rr.com The box said: "Requires Windows 98 or better", so I installed Linux. -----------------------------------------------