From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] use hlist for pid hash
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:46:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4128252E.1080002@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412824BE.4040801@yahoo.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 96 bytes --]
Any reason why this shouldn't be done? Anyone know of a decent test that
stresses the pid hash?
[-- Attachment #2: pid-use-hlist.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3475 bytes --]
Use hlists for the PID hashes. This halves the memory footprint of these
hashes. No benchmarks, but I think this is a worthy improvement because
the hashes are something that would be likely to have significant portions
loaded into the cache of every CPU on some workloads.
This comes at the "expense" of
1. reintroducing the memory prefetch into the hash traversal loop;
2. adding new pids to the head of the list instead of the tail. I
suspect that if this was a big problem then the hash isn't sized
well or could benefit from moving hot entries to the head.
Also, account for all the pid hashes when reporting hash memory usage.
---
linux-2.6-npiggin/include/linux/pid.h | 2 +-
linux-2.6-npiggin/kernel/pid.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN kernel/pid.c~pid-use-hlist kernel/pid.c
--- linux-2.6/kernel/pid.c~pid-use-hlist 2004-08-22 14:42:56.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6-npiggin/kernel/pid.c 2004-08-22 14:42:56.000000000 +1000
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/hash.h>
#define pid_hashfn(nr) hash_long((unsigned long)nr, pidhash_shift)
-static struct list_head *pid_hash[PIDTYPE_MAX];
+static struct hlist_head *pid_hash[PIDTYPE_MAX];
static int pidhash_shift;
int pid_max = PID_MAX_DEFAULT;
@@ -150,11 +150,11 @@ failure:
fastcall struct pid *find_pid(enum pid_type type, int nr)
{
- struct list_head *elem, *bucket = &pid_hash[type][pid_hashfn(nr)];
+ struct hlist_node *elem;
struct pid *pid;
- __list_for_each(elem, bucket) {
- pid = list_entry(elem, struct pid, hash_chain);
+ hlist_for_each_entry(pid, elem,
+ &pid_hash[type][pid_hashfn(nr)], hash_chain) {
if (pid->nr == nr)
return pid;
}
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ int fastcall attach_pid(task_t *task, en
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pid->task_list);
pid->task = task;
get_task_struct(task);
- list_add(&pid->hash_chain, &pid_hash[type][pid_hashfn(nr)]);
+ hlist_add_head(&pid->hash_chain,
+ &pid_hash[type][pid_hashfn(nr)]);
}
list_add_tail(&task->pids[type].pid_chain, &pid->task_list);
task->pids[type].pidptr = pid;
@@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ static inline int __detach_pid(task_t *t
return 0;
nr = pid->nr;
- list_del(&pid->hash_chain);
+ hlist_del(&pid->hash_chain);
put_task_struct(pid->task);
return nr;
@@ -282,9 +283,9 @@ void __init pidhash_init(void)
pidhash_shift = min(12, pidhash_shift);
pidhash_size = 1 << pidhash_shift;
- printk("PID hash table entries: %d (order %d: %Zd bytes)\n",
+ printk("PID hash table entries: %d (order: %d, %Zd bytes)\n",
pidhash_size, pidhash_shift,
- pidhash_size * sizeof(struct list_head));
+ PIDTYPE_MAX * pidhash_size * sizeof(struct hlist_head));
for (i = 0; i < PIDTYPE_MAX; i++) {
pid_hash[i] = alloc_bootmem(pidhash_size *
@@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ void __init pidhash_init(void)
if (!pid_hash[i])
panic("Could not alloc pidhash!\n");
for (j = 0; j < pidhash_size; j++)
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pid_hash[i][j]);
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&pid_hash[i][j]);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB
kgdb_pid_init_done++;
diff -puN include/linux/pid.h~pid-use-hlist include/linux/pid.h
--- linux-2.6/include/linux/pid.h~pid-use-hlist 2004-08-22 14:42:56.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6-npiggin/include/linux/pid.h 2004-08-22 14:42:56.000000000 +1000
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct pid
atomic_t count;
struct task_struct *task;
struct list_head task_list;
- struct list_head hash_chain;
+ struct hlist_node hash_chain;
};
struct pid_link
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-22 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-22 4:44 [PATCH 1/2] fix PID hash sizing Nick Piggin
2004-08-22 4:46 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-08-22 5:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] use hlist for pid hash David S. Miller
2004-08-22 5:31 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-22 5:25 ` Ryan Cumming
2004-08-22 5:26 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-06 11:35 ` [PATCH] Allocate correct amount of memory " Anton Blanchard
2004-09-06 11:41 ` Nick Piggin
2004-08-22 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] fix PID hash sizing William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-23 0:16 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4128252E.1080002@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox