From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266854AbUHVNG7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:06:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266863AbUHVNG6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:06:58 -0400 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:35557 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266854AbUHVNGm (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:06:42 -0400 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:05:39 +0200 To: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, diablod3@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, der.eremit@email.de Subject: Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices Message-ID: <41289A23.nail9NS1V89GZ@burner> References: <2ptdY-42Y-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <2uPdM-380-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <2uUwL-6VP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <2uWfh-8jo-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <2uXl0-Gt-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <2vge2-63k-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <2vgQF-6Ai-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <2vipq-7O8-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <2vj2b-8md-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <2vDtS-bq-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <412770EA.nail9DO11D18Y@burner> <412889FC.nail9MX1X3XW5@burner> <41288E10.nail9MX3BDIPM@burner> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patrick McFarland wrote: > On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:14:08 +0200, Joerg Schilling > wrote: > > Eveybody makes mistakes. Not being able to admid that and persisting to > > continue to go in a wrong direction is the real problem. > > Yes, everyone does. Yours was flaming kernel developers over the lkml > about bugs in your own program; yet, you do not admit to this, and > continue to piss everyone off. You seem to be unable to distinct between cause and effect. Some pleople at Linux kernel ML did start to flame me while I was trying to do my best to give technical based explanations. As it has been proven that threre _are_ reasonable people in LKML, it would help LKML to regain credibility if they could try to do some self cleaning and find a way to calm down the non-serious people. You also seem to be unable to judge where bugs are located while looking at problems. It seems that we just agreed with the reasonable members of LKML that there was and still is a security related bug in Linux. The "fix" that used in hope to remove the security problems did just create new problems instead of removing old ones. If you have nothing useful to say, please stay quiet. Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1 schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily