From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264256AbUHWNYJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:24:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264154AbUHWNYJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:24:09 -0400 Received: from fep02fe.ttnet.net.tr ([212.156.4.132]:46285 "EHLO fep02.ttnet.net.tr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264256AbUHWNYH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:24:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4129EFC6.1@ttnet.net.tr> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:23:18 +0300 From: "O.Sezer" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: tr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.4.28-pre1] more gcc3.4 inline fixes [2/10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > mxser_interrupt() is not inline, why are messing around with it? it calls mxser_transmit_chars and if it's not moved after it my gcc failed. (I admit the patches become messy if inlines are simply not removed but I didn't want to do such changes where possible).