From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264286AbUHWNma (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:42:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264298AbUHWNma (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:42:30 -0400 Received: from fep02fe.ttnet.net.tr ([212.156.4.132]:43753 "EHLO fep02.ttnet.net.tr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264286AbUHWNm3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:42:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4129F41A.3070805@ttnet.net.tr> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:41:46 +0300 From: "O.Sezer" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: tr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4] gcc-3.4 more fixes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Ozkan, >> >> This are just warning fixes right? >> >> I dont like this patches, that is, I'm not confident about them. >> >> Let the warnings be. > > For gcc-3.4 they're warnings. For gcc-3.5 they'll cause compiler > failures (that's what mikpe says on cset-1.1490, too) As a side note, almost all of them are in 2.6 anyway (can't honestly remember which aren't)