From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265212AbUHWPto (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:49:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265490AbUHWPrl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:47:41 -0400 Received: from fep01fe.ttnet.net.tr ([212.156.4.130]:7388 "EHLO fep01.ttnet.net.tr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265212AbUHWPp4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:45:56 -0400 Message-ID: <412A10FF.9080004@ttnet.net.tr> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:45:03 +0300 From: "O.Sezer" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: tr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.4.28-pre1] more gcc3.4 inline fixes [9/10] References: <412A087A.90300@ttnet.net.tr> In-Reply-To: <412A087A.90300@ttnet.net.tr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org O.Sezer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:17:41PM +0300, O.Sezer wrote: > > >> --- 28p1/include/linux/fs.h~ 2004-08-16 20:23:00.000000000 +0300 > >> +++ 28p1/include/linux/fs.h 2004-08-17 13:02:49.000000000 +0300 > > >> And what about the actual function declaration in mm/ ? > > Looking into this (slowly, not a good day :/ ). It only served > to fix compilation of fs/xfs/linux-2.4/xfs_lrw.c (its only direct > user, iirc). Will see if can find anything better. > I'd end-up unlinlining it there, too. What do you think?