From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
To: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, der.eremit@email.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels?
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:07:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <412B3D93.nailBKG21RB5G@burner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1BzayM-00005W-Oc@localhost>
Pascal Schmidt <der.eremit@email.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 06:20:06 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel:
>
> > Dou you know of any other system where you can say:
> >
> > Print me a strack trace with symbols for all processes on this
> > computer (even stripped ones) that call gettimeofday() within the
> > next few seconds.
>
> Well, this is by far off-topic here now, but how does this solve
> the general problem of knowing that gettimeofday() might be a
> problem in the given situation? But yeah, once you know that,
> the functionality is useful, no doubt.
If you did not get it yet, it's an example to show what may be done.
There are many more features. Just fetch the
"Solaris Dynamic Tracing Guide"
manual as PDF for more information - it's 300 pages.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-24 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2wAWW-12a-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-24 13:04 ` DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels? Pascal Schmidt
2004-08-24 13:07 ` Joerg Schilling [this message]
2004-08-24 4:14 Joerg Schilling
2004-08-28 19:15 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <2v3Ad-5tc-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2v4w9-6aQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vxeJ-4kg-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vZNN-7AT-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2w5q4-34M-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2w9Dq-65C-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-23 18:19 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] <2ptdY-42Y-55@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uPdM-380-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uUwL-6VP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uWfh-8jo-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2uXl0-Gt-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vge2-63k-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vgQF-6Ai-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vipq-7O8-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vj2b-8md-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2vDtS-bq-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-21 15:01 ` PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices Pascal Schmidt
2004-08-21 15:57 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 11:56 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 13:13 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-08-22 16:00 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-08-22 16:32 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 17:18 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-08-22 19:22 ` DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels? Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 19:26 ` PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices Tonnerre
2004-08-22 20:14 ` DTrace-like analysis possible with future Linux kernels? Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 20:33 ` Tonnerre
2004-08-22 20:38 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-22 20:43 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-22 21:37 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-08-23 11:44 ` Joerg Schilling
2004-08-23 17:40 ` Horst von Brand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-19 22:22 Miles Lane
2004-08-19 23:01 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-08-19 23:23 ` Julien Oster
2004-08-19 22:33 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-20 10:08 ` Alex Bennee
2004-08-20 11:21 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-08-20 0:23 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-20 13:34 ` Alexander Nyberg
2004-08-20 13:46 ` Florian Weimer
2004-08-20 16:46 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 6:03 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-21 6:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 6:22 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-21 12:12 ` Julien Oster
2004-08-21 13:27 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-21 21:49 ` Bryan Cantrill
2004-08-23 23:08 ` Christoph Halder
2004-08-22 11:35 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-22 18:27 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-22 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-23 17:34 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-22 23:03 ` John Levon
2004-08-23 19:48 ` Robert Milkowski
2004-08-24 0:39 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-28 19:16 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 0:14 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-29 5:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 10:45 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2004-08-29 17:46 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 10:53 ` Robert Milkowski
2004-08-29 10:29 ` Robert Milkowski
2004-08-31 20:16 ` Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=412B3D93.nailBKG21RB5G@burner \
--to=schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=der.eremit@email.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox