From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: spaminos-ker@yahoo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:39:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <412DA1C3.6020505@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412D4E01.7000504@bigpond.net.au>
Peter Williams wrote:
> spaminos-ker@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> --- Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>> You could try Lee Revell's (rlrevell@joe-job.com) latency measuring
>>> patches and also try applying Ingo Molnar's (mingo@elte.hu)
>>> voluntary-preempt patches.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> I tried 2.6.8.1 with voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9 and I am getting
>> latency
>> messages, they trigger at around the same time I get "delta = 3"
>> messages.
>>
>> I guess that there is no way to have the latency reporting work with
>> the zaphod
>> patch?
>
>
> I'll see what I can do and let you know.
A (gzipped) combined ZAPHOD and P9 voluntary preempt patch for 2.6.8.1
is available at:
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.8.1-zaphod-vp-v5.0.1.gz?download>
This patch has had minimal testing so use with care and please let me
know if there are any problems.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-26 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <411D50AE.5020005@bigpond.net.au>
2004-08-17 23:19 ` Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) spaminos-ker
2004-08-18 0:12 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 21:11 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-24 23:04 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 23:22 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-26 2:30 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-26 2:42 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-26 8:39 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2004-08-28 1:59 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 0:21 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 0:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 0:45 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 2:03 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 2:28 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 4:53 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 1:19 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 1:22 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 1:31 ` Peter Williams
2004-09-13 20:09 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 2:20 ` Lee Revell
[not found] <20040811093945.GA10667@elte.hu>
2004-08-17 23:08 ` spaminos-ker
[not found] <20040811010116.GL11200@holomorphy.com>
2004-08-11 2:21 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-11 2:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11 2:45 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 2:47 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:23 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:31 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 3:46 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:44 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-13 0:13 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-13 1:44 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 10:24 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-12 2:04 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12 2:24 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12 2:53 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-07 21:53 spaminos-ker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=412DA1C3.6020505@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spaminos-ker@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox