From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269568AbUHZUDb (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:03:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269461AbUHZTyO (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:54:14 -0400 Received: from fep01fe.ttnet.net.tr ([212.156.4.130]:15327 "EHLO fep01.ttnet.net.tr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269528AbUHZTvP (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:51:15 -0400 Message-ID: <412E3EEB.5010603@ttnet.net.tr> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:50:03 +0300 From: "O.Sezer" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: tr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.28-pre2 References: <412E012F.4050503@ttnet.net.tr> <20040826191501.GA12772@fs.tum.de> In-Reply-To: <20040826191501.GA12772@fs.tum.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:26:39PM +0300, O.Sezer wrote: > > >>Hi Marcelo: >> >> >>>Also a bunch of gcc 3.4 fixes, hopefully we are done >>>with that now. >> >>Fairly close, but not complete. You need the two patches at: >>... > > > I've found six compile errors in -pre2 with gcc 3.4 I'll send patches > for. Which are they, I'm curious? > There are still tons of warnings for lvalues and a few other warnings, Are there more other than the two patches I referenced fix and the five I listed? Which are they? > but I don't see a pressing need to fix these: > > They are not a real problem with gcc 3.4, and whether gcc 3.5 will ever > be supported as compiler for kernel 2.4 is a question whose answer lies > far in the future. That is a valid point but it'd be sad if gcc3.5 wouldn't be supported. > cu > Adrian > Cheers. Ozkan