From: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
jh@sgi.com, jlan@engr.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
erikj@dbear.engr.sgi.com, limin@engr.sgi.com,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] new CSA patchset for 2.6.8
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:24:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <412F989B.1020703@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040826205349.0582d38e.akpm@osdl.org>
My proposed patchset includes three accounting data collection
patches and one CSA loadable module that make use of the
collected data. The three data collection patches (in the area
of io, mm and end-of-process) do not conflict with BSD accounting
or ELSA. They can be viewed as "enhancement" to both BSD and
ELSA as Guillaume, the maintainer of ELSA put it:
Therefore the solution could be to enhance BSD accounting with data
collection from CSA and provide per job accounting with a userspace
mechanism. Sounds great to me...
It would be then up to BSD, ELSA or CSA to decide how to process
the collected data and present it to users.
All response so far seems to favor this unified data collection
method proposal.
The ELSA approach appears to make changes to kernel/acct.c while
CSA will provide its own loadable module.
Of the three data collection patches, csa_io and csa_eop are very
much CSA-independent. I certainly can make csa_mm more so as well.
I think it is a everyone-win situation for all three projects. :)
Regards,
- jay
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Thanks, guys. So we now know that there are three potential
> implementations which do much the same thing, yes?
>
> I didn't get a sense of a preferred direction, but at least nobody is
> flaming anybody else yet ;)
>
> It strikes me that CSA is the most actively developed and is the furthest
> along. But that enhancing BSD accounting might be the least intrusive and
> most back-compatible approach.
>
> Is that a fair summary? If not, what should I have said?
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Lse-tech mailing list
> Lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-27 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-26 0:25 [PATCH] new CSA patchset for 2.6.8 Jay Lan
2004-08-26 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-26 17:15 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-08-26 18:26 ` [Lse-tech] " Jay Lan
2004-08-26 19:44 ` Arthur Corliss
2004-08-26 18:43 ` John Hesterberg
2004-08-27 8:26 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-08-26 19:24 ` Arthur Corliss
2004-08-26 20:05 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-08-26 20:46 ` Jay Lan
2004-08-28 1:27 ` Arthur Corliss
2004-08-30 12:26 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2004-08-31 14:19 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-08-31 23:01 ` [Lse-tech] " Jay Lan
2004-09-08 18:32 ` Jay Lan
[not found] ` <20040827054218.GA4142@frec.bull.fr>
2004-08-27 19:31 ` John Hesterberg
2004-08-30 8:29 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-08-27 19:55 ` Jay Lan
2004-08-31 9:06 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2004-08-31 10:29 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2004-08-31 16:04 ` Limin Gu
2004-09-01 21:44 ` John Hesterberg
2004-08-28 1:33 ` Arthur Corliss
2004-08-28 1:26 ` Arthur Corliss
2004-08-26 18:38 ` [Lse-tech] " John Hesterberg
[not found] ` <412EADBC.60607@bigpond.net.au>
[not found] ` <20040826205349.0582d38e.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-08-27 20:24 ` Jay Lan [this message]
2004-08-30 19:10 ` John Hesterberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=412F989B.1020703@sgi.com \
--to=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=erikj@dbear.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=jh@sgi.com \
--cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=limin@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox