From: QuantumG <qg@biodome.org>
To: Craig Milo Rogers <rogers@isi.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reverse engineering pwcx
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:57:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <413002C2.7090607@biodome.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040828033552.GN24018@isi.edu>
Craig Milo Rogers wrote:
> If the "now clearly false" is meant to be a consequence of the
>entropy measurements poster I referred to, I wouldn't jump the gun.
>On reflection, it's entirely natural for a decompressed stream to
>examine less entropy than the corresponding compressed stream!
>
>
First let me apologize to the list. I get carried away now and then :)
Actually I was refering to the fact that these algorithms are not
"decompression" in any way shape or form. These cameras don't capture
640x480 images, compress them in hardware, transfer the data over a USB
cable for the driver to then "decompress". They capture at some lower
resolution (160x120 has been claimed) and the driver simply interpolates
the data to produce the claimed resolution. There is nothing "true"
about the 640x480 resolution at all.
So yeah, Logitech is making false claims to their customers and seeing
as they get their chips from Philips I'm thinking they are responsible.
Trent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-28 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-28 0:52 reverse engineering pwcx QuantumG
[not found] ` <20040828012055.GL24018@isi.edu>
[not found] ` <20040828014931.GM24018@isi.edu>
2004-08-28 3:14 ` QuantumG
2004-08-28 3:35 ` Craig Milo Rogers
2004-08-28 3:49 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 12:23 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 19:20 ` Chris Meadors
2004-08-28 3:57 ` QuantumG [this message]
2004-08-28 12:07 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 6:47 ` Clem Taylor
2004-08-28 12:23 ` Wouter Van Hemel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28 16:17 Albert Cahalan
2004-08-28 16:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 16:56 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-28 17:11 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 18:05 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 17:53 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-08-28 18:04 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 18:08 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 21:04 ` Helge Hafting
2004-08-30 7:42 ` Paul Jakma
2004-08-30 12:52 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-30 20:23 ` dulle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=413002C2.7090607@biodome.org \
--to=qg@biodome.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogers@isi.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox