From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] cpuidle: menu: Get rid of first_idx from menu_select()
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 23:44:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4130376.2FFt7p4687@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3510260.hvypppS8Bs@aspire.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rearrange the code in menu_select() so that the loop over idle states
always starts from 0 and get rid of the first_idx variable.
While at it, add two empty lines to separate conditional statements
one another.
No intentional behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -285,7 +285,6 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr
struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices);
int latency_req = cpuidle_governor_latency_req(dev->cpu);
int i;
- int first_idx;
int idx;
unsigned int interactivity_req;
unsigned int expected_interval;
@@ -348,36 +347,33 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_dr
latency_req = interactivity_req;
}
- first_idx = 0;
- if (drv->states[0].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING) {
- struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[1];
- unsigned int polling_threshold;
-
- /*
- * Default to a physical idle state, not to busy polling, unless
- * a timer is going to trigger really really soon.
- */
- polling_threshold = max_t(unsigned int, 20, s->target_residency);
- if (data->next_timer_us > polling_threshold &&
- latency_req > s->exit_latency && !s->disabled &&
- !dev->states_usage[1].disable)
- first_idx = 1;
- }
-
/*
* Find the idle state with the lowest power while satisfying
* our constraints.
*/
idx = -1;
- for (i = first_idx; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
struct cpuidle_state_usage *su = &dev->states_usage[i];
if (s->disabled || su->disable)
continue;
+
if (idx == -1)
idx = i; /* first enabled state */
+
if (s->target_residency > predicted_us) {
+ /*
+ * Use a physical idle state, not busy polling, unless
+ * a timer is going to trigger really really soon.
+ */
+ if ((drv->states[idx].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING) &&
+ i == idx + 1 && latency_req > s->exit_latency &&
+ data->next_timer_us > max_t(unsigned int, 20,
+ s->target_residency)) {
+ idx = i;
+ break;
+ }
if (predicted_us < TICK_USEC)
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-02 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-02 21:41 [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle: menu: Fixes, optimizations and cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-02 21:42 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpuidle: menu: Fix wakeup statistics updates for polling state Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 8:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-02 21:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] cpuidle: menu: Compute first_idx when latency_req is known Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 14:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-02 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-10-04 7:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] cpuidle: menu: Get rid of first_idx from menu_select() Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-04 7:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-04 14:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-04 17:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-05 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-05 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-02 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpuidle: menu: Do not update last_state_idx in menu_select() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 14:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] cpuidle: menu: Avoid computations for very close timers Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 15:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-10-04 17:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-02 21:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpuidle: menu: Move the latency_req == 0 special case check Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 6:55 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpuidle: menu: Fixes, optimizations and cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-04 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4130376.2FFt7p4687@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox