From: Chris Meadors <clubneon@hereintown.net>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Craig Milo Rogers <rogers@isi.edu>, QuantumG <qg@biodome.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: reverse engineering pwcx
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:20:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4130DB18.2020208@hereintown.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040828122333.GC1841@ucw.cz>
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> But 160x120 sounds pretty ridiculous. It still would be possible to
> scale that to 640x480 smoothly, but the image would be obviously blurry
> and just awful even with avanced Bayer-based scaling techniques.
That sounds about right. At 640x480 the QuickCam 3000 is an awful
blurry mess. Though I think the actual pixel count would be a multiple
(divisor) of CIF, because in the nCIF resolutions it seems to expose
more pixels.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-28 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-28 0:52 reverse engineering pwcx QuantumG
[not found] ` <20040828012055.GL24018@isi.edu>
[not found] ` <20040828014931.GM24018@isi.edu>
2004-08-28 3:14 ` QuantumG
2004-08-28 3:35 ` Craig Milo Rogers
2004-08-28 3:49 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 12:23 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 19:20 ` Chris Meadors [this message]
2004-08-28 3:57 ` QuantumG
2004-08-28 12:07 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 6:47 ` Clem Taylor
2004-08-28 12:23 ` Wouter Van Hemel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28 16:17 Albert Cahalan
2004-08-28 16:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 16:56 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-28 17:11 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 18:05 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 17:53 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-08-28 18:04 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 18:08 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 21:04 ` Helge Hafting
2004-08-30 7:42 ` Paul Jakma
2004-08-30 12:52 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-30 20:23 ` dulle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4130DB18.2020208@hereintown.net \
--to=clubneon@hereintown.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qg@biodome.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=rogers@isi.edu \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox