From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: spaminos-ker@yahoo.com
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:31:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <413131DD.4060604@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093742542.7078.18.camel@krustophenia.net>
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 21:19, spaminos-ker@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>--- Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Is this an SMP machine? There were problems with that version of the
>>>voluntary preemption patches on SMP. The latest version, Q3, should fix
>>>these.
>>>
>>
>>No, it's a single CPU Athlon 1800+, the kernel is compiled in with support for
>>SMP system, but that should not have any impact.
>>
>
>
> I believe people were also having problems running SMP kernels with the
> VP patches on UP. Try the latest version. Q3 as of this writing.
Nicolas,
I'll generate a combined patch and let you know when it's ready. In
the mean time, could you try increasing the "base_promotion_interval" to
about twice the time slice size?
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <411D50AE.5020005@bigpond.net.au>
2004-08-17 23:19 ` Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) spaminos-ker
2004-08-18 0:12 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 21:11 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-24 23:04 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 23:22 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-26 2:30 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-26 2:42 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-26 8:39 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-28 1:59 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 0:21 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 0:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 0:45 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 2:03 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 2:28 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 4:53 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29 1:19 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 1:22 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 1:31 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2004-09-13 20:09 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29 2:20 ` Lee Revell
[not found] <20040811093945.GA10667@elte.hu>
2004-08-17 23:08 ` spaminos-ker
[not found] <20040811010116.GL11200@holomorphy.com>
2004-08-11 2:21 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-11 2:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11 2:45 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 2:47 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:23 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:31 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 3:46 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:44 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-13 0:13 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-13 1:44 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11 3:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 10:24 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-12 2:04 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12 2:24 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12 2:53 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-07 21:53 spaminos-ker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=413131DD.4060604@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=spaminos-ker@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox