From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM / sleep: make pm notifier called symmetrically
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 02:40:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4137764.SdaSPLogrJ@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFUiJhKJT5W_fq_hMGSG7rCUU4dx9o-H5SLiYWmktem2faj1w@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, June 06, 2016 10:41:25 PM Lianwei Wang wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> This makes pm notifier PREPARE/POST symmetrical: if PREPARE
> >>> fails, we will only undo what ever happened on PREPARE.
> >>>
> >>> It fixes the unbalanced cpu hotplug enable in cpu pm notifier.
> >>
> >> Can you please describe the problem you're trying to address in a bit
> >> more detail?
> >
> > It is described in another patch, and it is a common issue. I fixed
> > the similar issue several times, all because that the CPU_POST_SUSPEND
> > notifier callback is called without call CPU_SUSPEND_PREPARE notifier
> > callback before. Something is DO in PM_XXX_PREPARE and UNDO in
> > POST_XXX. If we don't DO it in XXX_PREPARE then we don't need to UNDO
> > it in PM_POST_XXX.
> >
> > Here is the link for the unbalanced cpu hotplug enable case:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/6/61 .
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lianwei
>
> Did anyone from the maintainer review the patch yet?
Yes, I have reviewed it, but not yet decided whether or not I will accept it.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 6:07 [PATCH v1] PM / sleep: make pm notifier called symmetrically Lianwei Wang
2016-05-18 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-19 6:06 ` Lianwei Wang
2016-06-07 5:41 ` Lianwei Wang
2016-06-08 0:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-10 6:47 Lianwei Wang
2016-06-10 14:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-11 6:23 ` Lianwei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4137764.SdaSPLogrJ@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=lianwei.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox