From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267356AbUIJLhT (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:37:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267378AbUIJLhT (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:37:19 -0400 Received: from a26.t1.student.liu.se ([130.236.221.26]:59618 "EHLO mail.drzeus.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267356AbUIJLhS (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:37:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4141928C.80908@drzeus.cx> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:39:56 +0200 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040704) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: ISA DMA demand mode X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The ISA DMA routines only have predefined constants for doing single DMA transfers. Is there some reason why one shouldn't use demand transfers? Hard coding DMA controller flags into my driver just feels wrong. -- Pierre Ossman