Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer

Tim Hockin
2004-09-15T01:12:11Z

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:09:01AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 05:07:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:45:53PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > Do we agree on the model that the signal is a simple verb and we keep
> > > only a small dictionary of _static_ signal strings and no fancy compositions?

I don't have any concrete examples right now, but it seems that this is
being locked down pretty tightly for no real reason...

Just a passing thought.