From: Christopher Chan <cchan@outblaze.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Seiji Kihara <kihara.seiji@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
ext3-users@redhat.com, ospfs@lab.ntt.co.jp,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com,
adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BUG on fsync/fdatasync with Ext3 data=journal
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:51:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <414AA5A6.3020907@outblaze.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040916145059.44a7e800.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seiji Kihara <kihara.seiji@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
>>We found that fsync and fdatasync syscalls sometimes don't sync
>>data in an ext3 file system under the following conditions.
>>
>>1. Kernel version is 2.6.6 or later (including 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.9-rc2).
>>2. Ext3's journalling mode is "data=journal".
>>
>>The problem was occurred since 2.6.5-bk1, which includes the patch
>>"[PATCH] ext3 fsync() and fdatasync() speedup". We found that the
>>problem was solved by deleting the part of the patch which
>>modifies ext3_sync_file(). Maybe, i_state is not correctly set to
>>I_DIRTY when the related page cache is dirty (is it true?)
>
I have a few qmail (about the heaviest fsync using mta software around)
boxes that have their queues on ext3.
On a 2.6.7 kernel, these guys are guaranteed to crash within hours if I
used data=journal for the fs on which the qmail queues are. I say this
because I ran two of them with data=journal mode and they crashed once
or more a day. Another one which stayed with ordered had no problems
during the same period.
Going back to ordered meant that they ran stable for days (weeks now).
The only thing I could get from the logs is:
---------------------------
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: Assertion failure in
__journal_drop_transaction() at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:613: "transaction->t
_forget == NULL"
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:613!
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: SMP
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: Modules linked in: nfs lockd sunrpc e1000
e100 mii usbcore
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: CPU: 0
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c0193db0>] Not tainted
Aug 17 05:58:22 mta1-7 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.7)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-17 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ufz5i5q4r.wl%kihara.seiji@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2004-09-16 21:50 ` [PATCH] BUG on fsync/fdatasync with Ext3 data=journal Andrew Morton
2004-09-17 1:27 ` Seiji Kihara
2004-09-17 8:51 ` Christopher Chan [this message]
2004-09-18 20:47 ` Kenichi Okuyama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=414AA5A6.3020907@outblaze.com \
--to=cchan@outblaze.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=kihara.seiji@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ospfs@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox