From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268881AbUIQP6v (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:58:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268989AbUIQP6C (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:58:02 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:43500 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268881AbUIQPzD (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:55:03 -0400 Message-ID: <414B08C7.3050505@pobox.com> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:54:47 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florian Schirmer CC: Pekka Pietikainen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH][1/4] b44: Ignore carrier lost errors References: <200408292218.00756.jolt@tuxbox.org> <200408292233.03879.jolt@tuxbox.org> In-Reply-To: <200408292233.03879.jolt@tuxbox.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Florian Schirmer wrote: > Hi, > > some (?) hardware seems to be buggy and is reporting bogus carrier lost > values. Both reference implementations from Broadcom indicate that this > counter is not reliable and therefore ignore it. We should do the same. > "Fixes" the carrier lost problem i've seen. > > Regards, > Florian > > Signed-off-by: Florian Schirmer patch applied to 2.6.x