* [PATCH] NULL arg for get_device() / put_device()
[not found] ` <20040928012801.GA11125@kroah.com>
@ 2004-09-28 7:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2004-09-29 23:27 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2004-09-28 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: hotplug, Linux Kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 510 bytes --]
Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:21:49PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>is there a specific reason that get_device accepts NULL as argument,
>>whereas put_device() does not?
>
>
> Um, I guess I never thought about it :)
>
> I don't see why it wouldn't take it, feel free to send a patch.
>
Here it is. Please apply.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG S390 & zSeries
Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688
90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de
[-- Attachment #2: null-argument-for-put_device.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 694 bytes --]
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2004/09/28 08:59:54+02:00 hare@lammermuir.suse.de
# Since get_device() accepts a NULL argument, put_device() should do so, too.
#
# Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
#
# drivers/base/core.c
# 2004/09/28 08:59:49+02:00 hare@lammermuir.suse.de +2 -1
# put_device() should accept a NULL argument.
#
diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
--- a/drivers/base/core.c 2004-09-28 09:01:20 +02:00
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c 2004-09-28 09:01:20 +02:00
@@ -293,7 +293,8 @@
*/
void put_device(struct device * dev)
{
- kobject_put(&dev->kobj);
+ if (dev)
+ kobject_put(&dev->kobj);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NULL arg for get_device() / put_device()
2004-09-28 7:03 ` [PATCH] NULL arg for get_device() / put_device() Hannes Reinecke
@ 2004-09-29 23:27 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2004-09-29 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Reinecke; +Cc: hotplug, Linux Kernel
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:03:21AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:21:49PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>is there a specific reason that get_device accepts NULL as argument,
> >>whereas put_device() does not?
> >
> >
> >Um, I guess I never thought about it :)
> >
> >I don't see why it wouldn't take it, feel free to send a patch.
> >
> Here it is. Please apply.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-29 23:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <415805DD.4040708@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20040928012801.GA11125@kroah.com>
2004-09-28 7:03 ` [PATCH] NULL arg for get_device() / put_device() Hannes Reinecke
2004-09-29 23:27 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox