From: "Timo Teräs" <ext-timo.teras@nokia.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kobject events questions
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:37:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <415ABA96.6010908@nokia.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1201 bytes --]
Hi all,
I've been following the evolution of kobject events patch. This is
because I'd like to implement a netfilter target that is able to send an
event to userland using it.
There's a small description of it and some background in the netfilter
mailing list:
http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-August/016342.html
Now that the events are strictly associated with kobjects (the original
patch had a way to send arbitrary events) I have two choices:
1) Send the events so that they are always associated with the network
devices class_device kobject. I guess this would be quite clean way to
do it, but it'd require adding a new signal type and would limit the
iptables target to be associated always with a interface.
2) Create a device class that has virtual timer devices that trigger
events (ie. /sys/class/utimer). Each timer could have some attributes
(like expired, expire_time, etc.) and would emit "change" signals
whenever timer expires.
I'd like to hear what you think of the thing I'm trying to do?
And especially how "bad" idea the option 2 is (since the new class might
not be useful for others)?
Any ideas how this could be done better?
- Timo
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-29 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-29 13:37 Timo Teräs [this message]
2004-09-29 19:39 ` kobject events questions Robert Love
2004-10-01 9:51 ` Timo Teräs
2004-10-01 16:47 ` Greg KH
2004-10-01 18:47 ` Teras Timo (EXT-YomiGroup/Helsinki)
2004-10-01 19:22 ` Greg KH
2004-10-06 10:39 ` Timo Teräs
2004-09-29 23:35 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=415ABA96.6010908@nokia.com \
--to=ext-timo.teras@nokia.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).