From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add hook for PCI resource deallocation
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:11:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <415CBCD8.4040206@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040930160318.3cebcb89.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:50:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I'm attaching updated patches for adding pcibiod_disable_device()
>> > > hook based on the feedback from Ashok (Thank you, Ashok!).
>> >
>> > This appears to be a patch-reversed version of the patch which is already
>> > in -mm:
>> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.9-rc2/2.6.9-rc2-mm4/broken-out/add-hook-for-pci-resource-deallocation.patch
>> >
>> > So I'm not sure what you're trying to do here.
>>
>>
>> In the original patch, Kenji added a dummy function in several source files. Instead now
>> the new patch should have a single default implementation with a __attribute__((weak))
>>
>> As a result its removing all the old additions and now keeping just a single default function.
>
> Oh. You may as well send a (chagelogged, signed off) new patch against
> current -linus in that case.
>
I'm sorry about that.
Please use the following patch.
Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige
Name: add_pcibios_disable_device_hook.patch
Kernel Version: 2.6.9-rc2-mm1
Depends: none
Change Log:
- Chaged to use __attrubute__ ((weak)) instead of modifying all
arch specific code.
Description:
This patch adds a hook 'pcibios_disable_device()' into
pci_disable_device() to call architecture specific PCI resource
deallocation code. It's a opposite part of pcibios_enable_device().
We need this hook to deallocate architecture specific PCI resource
such as IRQ resource, etc.. This patch is just for adding the hook, so
'pcibios_disable_device()' is defined as a null function on all
architecture so far.
I tested this patch on i386, x86_64 and ia64. But it has not been
tested on other architectures because I don't have these machines.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
linux-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-kanesige/drivers/pci/pci.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff -puN drivers/pci/pci.c~add_pcibios_disable_device_hook drivers/pci/pci.c
--- linux-2.6.9-rc2-mm1/drivers/pci/pci.c~add_pcibios_disable_device_hook 2004-09-27 11:10:54.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.9-rc2-mm1-kanesige/drivers/pci/pci.c 2004-09-27 16:24:43.944414436 +0900
@@ -392,6 +392,16 @@ pci_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
}
/**
+ * pcibios_disable_device - disable arch specific PCI resources for device dev
+ * @dev: the PCI device to disable
+ *
+ * Disables architecture specific PCI resources for the device. This
+ * is the default implementation. Architecture implementations can
+ * override this.
+ */
+void __attribute__ ((weak)) pcibios_disable_device (struct pci_dev *dev) {}
+
+/**
* pci_disable_device - Disable PCI device after use
* @dev: PCI device to be disabled
*
@@ -411,6 +421,8 @@ pci_disable_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
pci_command &= ~PCI_COMMAND_MASTER;
pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, pci_command);
}
+
+ pcibios_disable_device(dev);
}
/**
_
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-01 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-16 12:54 [PATCH] add hook for PCI resource deallocation Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-17 21:49 ` Greg KH
2004-09-21 1:35 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-24 0:49 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-24 20:02 ` Ashok Raj
2004-09-24 21:22 ` Greg KH
2004-09-27 8:06 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-28 22:00 ` Greg KH
2004-09-29 0:55 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-30 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-30 22:21 ` Ashok Raj
2004-09-30 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-01 2:11 ` Kenji Kaneshige [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=415CBCD8.4040206@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox