From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Xin Zhao <jackzxcui1989@163.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 16:41:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <415e925a-e9f0-40ad-9f53-263dd34dd2a9@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260206142245.58987-15-frederic@kernel.org>
Hi Frederic,
On 2/6/26 7:52 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The dyntick-idle cputime accounting always assumes that IRQ time
> accounting is enabled and consequently stops elapsing the idle time
> during dyntick-idle IRQs.
>
> This doesn't mix up well with disabled IRQ time accounting because then
> idle IRQs become a cputime blind-spot. Also this feature is disabled
> on most configurations and the overhead of pausing dyntick-idle
> accounting while in idle IRQs could then be avoided.
>
> Fix the situation with conditionally pausing dyntick-idle accounting
> during idle IRQs only if neither native vtime (which does IRQ time
> accounting) nor generic IRQ time accounting are enabled.
>
> Also make sure that the accumulated IRQ time is not accidentally
> substracted from later accounting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cputime.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index d588a4a50e57..92fa2f037b6e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static void irqtime_account_delta(struct irqtime *irqtime, u64 delta,
> u64_stats_update_begin(&irqtime->sync);
> cpustat[idx] += delta;
> irqtime->total += delta;
> - irqtime->tick_delta += delta;
> + if (!irqtime->idle_dyntick)
> + irqtime->tick_delta += delta;
Wouldn't kcpustat_idle_dyntick achieve the same thing?
> u64_stats_update_end(&irqtime->sync);
> }
>
> @@ -81,6 +82,16 @@ void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int offset)
> irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
> }
>
> +static inline void irqtime_dyntick_start(void)
> +{
> + __this_cpu_write(cpu_irqtime.idle_dyntick, true);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void irqtime_dyntick_stop(void)
> +{
> + __this_cpu_write(cpu_irqtime.idle_dyntick, false);
> +}
> +
> static u64 irqtime_tick_accounted(u64 maxtime)
> {
> struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
> @@ -94,6 +105,9 @@ static u64 irqtime_tick_accounted(u64 maxtime)
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING: */
>
> +static inline void irqtime_dyntick_start(void) { }
> +static inline void irqtime_dyntick_stop(void) { }
> +
> static u64 irqtime_tick_accounted(u64 dummy)
> {
> return 0;
> @@ -444,6 +458,7 @@ void kcpustat_dyntick_stop(u64 now)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!kc->idle_dyntick);
> kcpustat_idle_stop(kc, now);
> kc->idle_dyntick = false;
> + irqtime_dyntick_stop();
> vtime_dyntick_stop();
> steal_account_process_time(ULONG_MAX);
> }
> @@ -455,6 +470,7 @@ void kcpustat_dyntick_start(u64 now)
>
> if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu()) {
> vtime_dyntick_start();
> + irqtime_dyntick_start();
> kc->idle_dyntick = true;
> kcpustat_idle_start(kc, now);
> }
> @@ -464,7 +480,8 @@ void kcpustat_irq_enter(u64 now)
> {
> struct kernel_cpustat *kc = kcpustat_this_cpu;
>
> - if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu())
> + if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
> + (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
> kcpustat_idle_stop(kc, now);
> }
Scenario: context_tracking is not enabled(since nohz_full or isolcpus not specified) and
irqtime/native is not enabled. ( config is CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN + IRQ_TIME=n)
cpu goes into tickless mode. Gets irqs, but kcpustat_irq_enter/exit is nop.
Then the time it spent in irq is still accounted for idle time, during kcpustat_dyntick_stop?
Who is going to account the irq time in this case?
>
> @@ -472,7 +489,8 @@ void kcpustat_irq_exit(u64 now)
> {
> struct kernel_cpustat *kc = kcpustat_this_cpu;
>
> - if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu())
> + if (!vtime_generic_enabled_this_cpu() &&
> + (irqtime_enabled() || vtime_accounting_enabled_this_cpu()))
> kcpustat_idle_start(kc, now);
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index d30cca6870f5..cf677ff12b10 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -3307,6 +3307,7 @@ static inline void sched_core_tick(struct rq *rq) { }
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
>
> struct irqtime {
> + bool idle_dyntick;
> u64 total;
> u64 tick_delta;
> u64 irq_start_time;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 14:22 [PATCH 00/15 v2] tick/sched: Refactor idle cputime accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 01/15] sched/idle: Handle offlining first in idle loop Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-18 18:22 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 02/15] sched/cputime: Remove superfluous and error prone kcpustat_field() parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-18 18:25 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 03/15] sched/cputime: Correctly support generic vtime idle time Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/15] powerpc/time: Prepare to stop elapsing in dynticks-idle Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-19 18:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-24 15:41 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 7:46 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 9:45 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 10:34 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 11:14 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 13:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 13:54 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-25 17:47 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-25 17:59 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-26 4:06 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-26 7:32 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-02-26 12:57 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/15] s390/time: " Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/15] tick/sched: Unify idle cputime accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/15] cpufreq: ondemand: Simplify idle cputime granularity test Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/15] tick/sched: Remove nohz disabled special case in cputime fetch Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/15] tick/sched: Move dyntick-idle cputime accounting to cputime code Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/15] tick/sched: Remove unused fields Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/15] tick/sched: Account tickless idle cputime only when tick is stopped Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 12/15] tick/sched: Consolidate idle time fetching APIs Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 22:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched/cputime: Provide get_cpu_[idle|iowait]_time_us() off-case Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 11:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-03-20 14:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 15/15] sched/cputime: Handle dyntick-idle steal time correctly Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 11:17 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-24 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 00/15 v2] tick/sched: Refactor idle cputime accounting Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-11 17:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-12 7:02 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-18 18:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-16 14:51 [PATCH 00/15] " Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-16 14:52 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched/cputime: Handle idle irqtime gracefully Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=415e925a-e9f0-40ad-9f53-263dd34dd2a9@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jackzxcui1989@163.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox