linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Judith Lebzelter <judith@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:00:05 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41637BD5.7090001@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041005215116.3b0bd028.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:

> This tunable caused an 11% performance difference in (I assume) TPCx. 
> That's a big deal, and people will want to diddle it.
> 

True. But 2.5 I think really is too low (for anyone, except maybe a
CPU with no/a tiny L2 cache).

> If one number works optimally for all machines and workloads then fine.
> 

Yeah.. 10ms may bring up idle times a bit on other workloads. Judith
had some database tests that were very sensitive to this - if 10ms is
OK there, then I'd say it would be OK for most things.

> But yes, avoiding a tunable would be nice, but we need a tunable to work
> out whether we can avoid making it tunable ;)
> 

Heh. I think it would be good to have a automatic thingy to tune it.
A smarter cache_decay_ticks calculation would suit.

> Not that I'm soliciting patches or anything.  I'll duck this one for now.
> 

OK. Any idea when 2.6.9 will be coming out? :)

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-06  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-06  0:42 Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06  0:47 ` Con Kolivas
2004-10-06  1:02   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  0:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  3:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  4:30   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  4:51     ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  5:00       ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-10-06  5:09         ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  5:21           ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  5:33             ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  5:46               ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06  6:19               ` new dev model (was Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms) Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06  6:39                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06  8:56                   ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-06  9:44                   ` bert hubert
2004-10-06 14:00                     ` Andries Brouwer
2004-10-06 19:40                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 19:48                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 19:58                       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 20:37                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-07  1:08                           ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07  0:02                       ` Matt Mackall
2004-10-06  9:23                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06  9:57                   ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-10-06 19:33                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-06 22:23                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-06  5:52       ` Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 19:27       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 19:39         ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06 20:38           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 20:43             ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06 23:14               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-07  2:26                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-07  6:29                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-07  7:08                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07  7:26                     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 20:50             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 21:03               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06  7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 17:18   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 19:55     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 22:46     ` Peter Williams
2004-10-06 13:29 ` [patch] sched: auto-tuning task-migration Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 13:44   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-06 17:49   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-06 20:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-06 21:18       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-10-07  6:10         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-21  5:08   ` Paul Jackson
     [not found] <200410071028.01931.habanero@us.ibm.com>
2004-10-07 15:58 ` Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms Andrew Theurer
2004-10-08  9:47   ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-08 14:11     ` Andrew Theurer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-07 18:44 Albert Cahalan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41637BD5.7090001@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=judith@osdl.org \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).