From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@redhat.com,
david.balazic@hermes.si
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc3-mm2] EDD: use EXTENDED READ command, add CONFIG_EDD_SKIP_MBR
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:32:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4164D4D4.4040407@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041007051939.GA9075@lists.us.dell.com>
Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:39:54AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>Alas, this does not eliminate the 30-second delay on my box.
>
>
> OK, thanks for trying. So it's not the READ SECTORS call itself
> that's the problem.
>
>
>>Just to re-emphasize, I feel a particularly relevant detail is that my
>>VIA-based Athlon64 box has _all_ PATA ports disabled.
>>
>>I am fairly certainly that the delay did not exist when I enabled at
>>least one PATA port, and I can verify this if you would like.
>
>
> Yeah, that'd be good to know. The PATA controller doesn't show up in
> your lspci results from 5 July, so I'm sure you had it turned off then too.
>
> BIOS reports having 4 disks in your system. Does that match
> what you would expect?
>
> Your boot disk is on this Promise controller, yes?
> 00:0d.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc. PDC20378
> (SATA150 TX) (rev 02)
>
> The second disk is on a different controller though, with its own EDD
> 3.0-compliant BIOS.
> 00:0f.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies,
> Inc. VIA VT6420 SATA
> RAID Controller (rev 80)
> Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MSI Neo K8T
> FIS2R mainboard
>
> Then BIOS says you've got two more disks.
> Both disks 82 and 83 look remarkably small (20808 sectors each,
> ~10MB). And I would bet there's no media present, as there's no
> mbr_signature field given... So BIOS says there's a disk there, but
> there really isn't. Which could cause the kind of timeout you're
> seeing. To what are these attached? It's the BIOS for this
> controller that's probably what's lying.
One SATA disk is attached to the Promise SATA controller, and one SATA
disk is attached to the VIA SATA controller.
I _think_ the Promise controller boots first, but I could be wrong.
I'll try enabling a PATA port sometime when it isn't 1:30am :)
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-07 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-04 21:48 [PATCH 2.6.9-rc3-mm2] EDD: use EXTENDED READ command, add CONFIG_EDD_SKIP_MBR Matt Domsch
2004-10-07 4:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-07 4:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07 4:25 ` Matt Domsch
2004-10-07 4:22 ` Matt Domsch
2004-10-07 4:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07 4:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-07 5:19 ` Matt Domsch
2004-10-07 5:32 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-27 16:53 Matt_Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4164D4D4.4040407@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=david.balazic@hermes.si \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox