Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

Paul Jackson
2004-10-11T22:45:42Z

Matthrew wrote:
> My (completely uninformed) guess is that the CKRM folks thought it would
> be extremely unlikely to be able to get the 'vrm' into the kernel
> without something to use it.

I'd guess the same thing.

> The 'vrm' and the fair share scheduler, should be
> logically separate pieces of code, though.

I agree - should be.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373